From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. City of Manchester

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 21, 2022
22-cv-93-JL (D.N.H. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-93-JL

11-21-2022

Jeremy Torres v. City of Manchester, NH, et al.

Jeremy Torres, pro se, Dona Feeney, Esq.


Jeremy Torres, pro se, Dona Feeney, Esq.

ORDER

Joseph N. LaPlante, United States District Judge

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 14, 2022 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).


Summaries of

Torres v. City of Manchester

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 21, 2022
22-cv-93-JL (D.N.H. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Torres v. City of Manchester

Case Details

Full title:Jeremy Torres v. City of Manchester, NH, et al.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

22-cv-93-JL (D.N.H. Nov. 21, 2022)