From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Central Parking System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-02266.

Decided January 20, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered December 5, 2002, which, upon the granting of the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in her favor and for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint.

Annette G. Hasapidis, P.C., South Salem, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael E. Pressman, New York, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: STEPHEN G. CRANE and WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when she tripped and fell in a hole in the roadway at the foot of a driveway leading to the defendants' parking garage. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding the defendants were negligent in not keeping their premises in a reasonably safe condition, and that such negligence was a substantial factor in bringing about the accident. The Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law, and entered a judgment dismissing the complaint.

There was no evidence to support the plaintiff's contention that the driveway constituted a special use of the public roadway by the defendants that caused the defect at issue ( see Nixdorf v. East Islip School Dist., 276 A.D.2d 759, 760; Simonds v. City of New York, 276 A.D.2d 478, 479; Achkhanian v. Town of Oyster Bay, 262 A.D.2d 510). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that, as a matter of law, the defendants were not at fault in the happening of the accident.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Torres v. Central Parking System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Torres v. Central Parking System

Case Details

Full title:RUTH TORRES, appellant, v. CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 629

Citing Cases

Roberts v. The Ford Found.

The submitted photos showed a non-defective driveway/sidewalk, and Ms. Roberts did not testify that she…