From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-200 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-200 Erie.

June 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 9, 2008 and was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The chief magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on May 20, 2009 [22], recommends that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [19] be granted in part and denied in part. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th Day of June, 2009;

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [19] be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for monetary damages against the Commonwealth Defendants in their official capacities is GRANTED and said claims are DISMISSED;
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Beard is DENIED;
3. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim and/or have summary judgment entered in their favor with regard to such claim is DENIED; and
4. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's retaliation claim and/or have summary judgment entered in their favor with regard to such claim is DENIED.

The report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated May 20, 2009 [22], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Torres v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-200 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Torres v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:LUIS TORRES, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 16, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-200 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Wetzel

throat, coughing and production of sputum” sufficient); Alvarado v. Litscher, 267 F.3d 648, 651 (7th Cir.…

Moore v. Dep't of Corr.

n, 316 F.3d at 268 (allegations of “nausea, inability to eat, headaches, chest pains, difficulty breathing,…