From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torrence v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 15, 2008
C.A. No. 07-331 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2008)

Opinion

C.A. No. 07-331 ERIE.

July 15, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiffs complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December 3, 2007, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on June 18, 2008, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction [Document # 29] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Objections were filed by the Plaintiff on July 3, 2008. Afterde novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction to Stop the Continued Opening and Copying of Privileged Legal Mail [Document # 29] is DENIED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated June 18, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Torrence v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 15, 2008
C.A. No. 07-331 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Torrence v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK TORRENCE, Plaintiff, v. SHELLEY LEE THOMPSON, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 15, 2008

Citations

C.A. No. 07-331 ERIE (W.D. Pa. Jul. 15, 2008)

Citing Cases

Karakozova v. University of Pittsburgh

As a court sitting in equity, the district court must weigh the four factors, but it is not incumbent on the…