Torrence v. Hseuh

Full title: DEAVON E. TORRENCE, Plaintiff, v. F. HSEUH, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN

09-28-2011

DEAVON E. TORRENCE, Plaintiff, v. F. HSEUH, et al., Defendants.

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 Christina Carroll, CSB #263713 Attorneys for defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333

Christina Carroll, CSB #263713

Attorneys for defendants

SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE,

GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK

ORDER

Defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants' counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff DEAVON E. TORRENCE (K-65602) via videoconference.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference (dkt. no. 61) is GRANTED.
2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE