From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torrence v. F. Hseuh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN.

September 29, 2011

WILLIAMS ASSOCIATES, Sacramento, CA, Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021, Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333, Christina Carroll, CSB #263713, Attorneys for defendants, SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK.


ORDER


Defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants' counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff DEAVON E. TORRENCE (K-65602) via videoconference.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference (dkt. no. 61) is GRANTED.
2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

Dated: September 28, 2011


Summaries of

Torrence v. F. Hseuh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Torrence v. F. Hseuh

Case Details

Full title:DEAVON E. TORRENCE, Plaintiff, v. F. HSEUH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)