Opinion
November 27, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).
Ordered that the order and interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the failure of the plaintiffs or their predecessor-in-title to contribute towards the maintenance of the subject property did not preclude the court from ordering partition by sale (see, Bufogle v Greek, 152 A.D.2d 527).
We have examined the appellants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.