From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. Unite Here 362

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 30, 2023
6:23-cv-1059-WWB-LHP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2023)

Opinion

6:23-cv-1059-WWB-LHP

11-30-2023

JOCELYN TORO, Plaintiff, v. UNITE HERE 362 and TCU LODGE 1908, Defendants


ORDER

LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:

MOTION: MOTION FOR JOINDER (Doc. No. 29)

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.

By the above-styled motion, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, requests “joinder of TCU Lodge 1908 as defendant and for the EEOC Right to Sue Letter and all administrative remedies to be recognized as completed or exhausted.” Doc. No. 29. Upon review, the motion will be denied without prejudice for failure to comply with the Local Rules. Specifically, the motion fails to include a memorandum of legal authority as required by Local Rule 3.01(a), and thus fails to establish the propriety of the relief Plaintiff seeks. In addition, the motion fails to comply with the conferral requirements of Local Rule 3.01(g). Any renewed motion must comply with the Local Rules.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Toro v. Unite Here 362

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 30, 2023
6:23-cv-1059-WWB-LHP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Toro v. Unite Here 362

Case Details

Full title:JOCELYN TORO, Plaintiff, v. UNITE HERE 362 and TCU LODGE 1908, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Nov 30, 2023

Citations

6:23-cv-1059-WWB-LHP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2023)