From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. Lindenwood, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22-CV-8357 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-8357 (JPO)

12-01-2022

ANDREW TORO, Plaintiff, v. LINDENWOOD, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant was served on October 14, 2022. However, no appearance has been entered on Defendant's behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.

Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Defendant or its counsel regarding a response to the complaint.

If Plaintiff fails by December 15, 2022, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Toro v. Lindenwood, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22-CV-8357 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Toro v. Lindenwood, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW TORO, Plaintiff, v. LINDENWOOD, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

Citations

22-CV-8357 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)