From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toro v. Gamescape Prime, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2022
Civil Action 22 Civ. 6003 (JLR) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22 Civ. 6003 (JLR) (SLC)

10-28-2022

JASMINE TORO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GAMESCAPE PRIME, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 14, 2022, Plaintiff Jasmine Toro (“Toro”) file the complaint. (ECF No. 1 (the “Complaint”)). On September 6, 2022, Toro filed the Summons and Complaint on Defendant Gametime Prime, Inc. (“Gametime”). (ECF No. 7 at 1). On September 25, 2022, Gametime filed a letter-motion seeking an extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (ECF No. 9). On September 26, 2022, the Court granted Gametime's motion, and ordered that Gametime shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by October 27, 2022. To date, Gametime has failed to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Accordingly, by Tuesday, November 1, 2022, Gametime shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Toro v. Gamescape Prime, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2022
Civil Action 22 Civ. 6003 (JLR) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Toro v. Gamescape Prime, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE TORO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22 Civ. 6003 (JLR) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)