From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tornatore v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Summary

In Tornatore v. Bruno (280 AD2d 894), we modified a prior order of Supreme Court by denying Tornatore's motion for summary judgment and vacating the reference to a referee, and we remitted the matter to afford Tornatore the opportunity to seek a default judgment of foreclosure and to afford Miller and Canal Corp. the opportunity to seek permission to serve a late answer.

Summary of this case from Tornatore v. Bruno

Opinion

February 7, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum:

129 Canal Street Corporation, d/b/a The Crazy Clam, and Michael Miller (defendants) appeal from an order denying their cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them, granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and referring the matter to a Referee to determine the amount owed plaintiff for, inter alia, principal and interest on the note and mortgage. Plaintiff should have moved for a default judgment rather than summary judgment ( see, CPLR 3215). Consequently, we modify the order by denying plaintiff's motion and vacating the reference, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings before a different Justice, to afford plaintiff the opportunity to seek a default judgment of foreclosure and to afford defendants the opportunity to seek permission to serve a late answer.


Summaries of

Tornatore v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 2001
280 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

In Tornatore v. Bruno (280 AD2d 894), we modified a prior order of Supreme Court by denying Tornatore's motion for summary judgment and vacating the reference to a referee, and we remitted the matter to afford Tornatore the opportunity to seek a default judgment of foreclosure and to afford Miller and Canal Corp. the opportunity to seek permission to serve a late answer.

Summary of this case from Tornatore v. Bruno
Case details for

Tornatore v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL T. TORNATORE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RONALD BRUNO, A/K/A RONALD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 436

Citing Cases

Wachovia Bank v. 75 Schermerhorn LLC

Insofar as the other defendants are concerned, Wachovia does not indicate which of them has served an answer,…

Tornatore v. Bruno

After Ronald died in 1997, Tornatore commenced a foreclosure action that was the subject of an earlier appeal…