From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-1031 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-1031 (JDB).

June 21, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint, "[n]otwithstanding any filing fee," upon a determination that it is "frivolous or malicious" or "fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff Mireille Torjman alleges that the United States government is using various forms of "mind control" on her, including "synthetic telepathy," "psychotronics," and other forms of surveillance, and seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief against several federal agencies. Compl. at 1-20. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios or contain "fanciful factual allegation[s]" are subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Ruston v. Bush, 298 Fed. App'x 16, 17 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-1031 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Case Details

Full title:MIREILLE TORJMAN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-1031 (JDB) (D.D.C. Jun. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

This is Mireille Torjman's second case alleging that the United States government has engaged in decades-long…