From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toriola v. Doar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 30, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-30

In the Matter of Rosemary Chinye Okolie TORIOLA, petitioner, v. Robert DOAR, et al., respondents.

Rosemary Chinye Okolie Toriola, Corona, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Roy A. Esnard pro se and Brent A. Surgeoner of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondents Robert Doar, Roy A. Esnard, and Najma Ali.


Rosemary Chinye Okolie Toriola, Corona, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Roy A. Esnard pro se and Brent A. Surgeoner of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondents Robert Doar, Roy A. Esnard, and Najma Ali.
Costello, Shea & Gaffney, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Yanique L. Burke of counsel), for respondent North Shore L.I.J. Forest Hills Hospital.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Robert Doar, among others, to answer a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the petitioner is enjoined from making any additional motions or commencing any additional proceedings in this Court regarding the proceedings entitled Matter of Toriola v. North Shore LIJ, commenced *913in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 20556/09, and Matter of Toriola v. Doar, commenced in this Court under Appellate Division Docket No. 2009–08265, and made returnable in the Supreme Court, Queens County, without leave of this Court; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding ( see CPLR 506[b]; 7804[b] ).

FLORIO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toriola v. Doar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 30, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Toriola v. Doar

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rosemary Chinye Okolie TORIOLA, petitioner, v. Robert…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4183
944 N.Y.S.2d 912