From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Topper v. Indiana Family Social Serv

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Mar 10, 1998
690 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 49A02-9605-CV-296

March 10, 1998

Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, The Honorable John F. Hanley, Judge, Cause No. 49D06-9503-M10431.

Jack Vanstone, Evansville, for Appellant.

Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General Christopher L. Lafuse, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for Appellee.


OPINION


Appellant, Rhonda Topper (Topper), appeals the review court's order, affirming the decision of appellee, Indiana Family and Social Service Administration (IFSSA), which sustained the revocation of Topper's child care home license. This case involves the identical issue decided today in Indiana Family Social Servs. Admin. v. Jones, No. 35A02-9707-CV-465 (March 10, 1998) Ind. App., 691 N.E.2d 1354.

Topper raises one issue for review:

(1) Whether she was entitled to challenge the "substantiation" of child abuse or neglect presented to the administrative law judge in her license revocation hearing.

We reverse for the reasons stated in Jones, supra, 691 N.E.2d 1354. Unlike Jones, the trial court here concluded that Topper was not entitled to challenge the "substantiation" of child abuse at her hearing on her license revocation. To allow the IFSSA to revoke Topper's license without affording her the opportunity to challenge the assertion, at the hearing, was a violation of due process.

The decision of the review court is reversed with instructions to remand to the IFSSA to conduct a full and fair hearing upon the merits of Topper's license revocation.

FRIEDLANDER, J., and KIRSCH, J., concur.


Summaries of

Topper v. Indiana Family Social Serv

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Mar 10, 1998
690 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Topper v. Indiana Family Social Serv

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA TOPPER, APPELLANT-PLAINTIFF, v. INDIANA FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICES…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Mar 10, 1998

Citations

690 N.E.2d 794 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Family and Social Svcs. Admin. v. Jones

However, we first turn to whether Jones was entitled to due process and what process is "due." In a companion…