From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toppan Photomasks, Inc. v. Park

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 25, 2014
3:13-cv-3323 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)

Opinion

          MARC N. BERNSTEIN WILL B. FITTON THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C. San Francisco, CA Attorneys for Defendant KEUN TAEK PARK

          DANIELLE OCHS BECKI D. GRAHAM OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

          MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks, Inc. (TPI) and Defendant Keun Taek Park (collectively "the Parties"), have been engaging in settlement talks since their last phone check-in with Magistrate Judge Corley on May 22, 2014, and progress is being made toward resolving this matter. In order to facilitate further settlement discussions, the Parties stipulate and request that the following dates in the Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. No. 53) and Stipulations and Orders Regarding Discovery (Dkt. Nos. 77 & 86) be modified as follows:

• Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from July 11, 2014 to September 12, 2014;

• Designation of Experts extended from August 1, 2014 to October 3, 2014;

• Designation of Rebuttal Experts extended from August 29, 2014 to October 24, 2014;

• Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from August 29, 2014 to November 14, 2014;

• Dispositive Motions filing deadline extended from September 19, 2014 to December 19, 2014;

• Meet and Confer (Civil Local Rule 16-10(b)(5)) extended from December 9, 2014 to March 3, 2015;

         The Pretrial Conference Date remains April 7, 2015 at 3:00 pm and the Jury Trial Date remains April 20, 2015 at 9:00 am, Courtroom 7, 19th Floor.

         In addition, to facilitate further settlement discussions, the Parties further stipulate and request that:

         (a) all discovery is stayed until August 11, 2014, after which the Parties may not serve new written discovery on each other without mutual agreement or order of the Court; and

         (b) the filing of a briefing schedule stipulation and the further briefing ordered by Magistrate Judge Spero in his May 29, 2014 and June 17, 2014 Orders on TPI's Motion for Sanctions be stayed until August 11, 2014, after which date the Parties shall file within eleven days a briefing schedule stipulation.

         SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED., and with the approval of Magistrate Judge Spero.


Summaries of

Toppan Photomasks, Inc. v. Park

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 25, 2014
3:13-cv-3323 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Toppan Photomasks, Inc. v. Park

Case Details

Full title:TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEUN TAEK PARK, an individual…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 25, 2014

Citations

3:13-cv-3323 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2014)