Opinion
April, 1897.
J. Stikeman, for appellant.
M.H. Oppenheim, for respondent.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Present: VAN WYCK, Ch. J., and McCARTHY, J.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Toplitz v. King Bridge Co.
City Court of New York, General Term
Apr 1, 1897
20 Misc. 720 (N.Y. City Ct. 1897)
Summaries of
Toplitz v. King Bridge Co.
City Court of New York, General Term
Apr 1, 1897
20 Misc. 720 (N.Y. City Ct. 1897)
Case details for
Toplitz v. King Bridge Co.
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE TOPLITZ, Respondent, v . THE KING BRIDGE CO., Appellant
Court:City Court of New York, General Term
Date published: Apr 1, 1897
Citations
20 Misc. 720 (N.Y. City Ct. 1897)