From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toote v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2004
7 A.D.3d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

1414.

Decided May 4, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered December 9, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff customer in a fall on defendant-appellant supermarket's premises, insofar as appealed from, denied the supermarket's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Kral, Clerkin, Redmond, Ryan, Perry Girvan, New York (Mary L. Maloney of counsel), for appellant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for Phyllis Toote, respondent.

Smetana, Villani, Rex Derrico, New York (Michael Seltzer of counsel) for Canada Dry Bottling Company of New York, Inc., respondent.

Before: Lerner, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Plaintiff alleges that she tripped over cases of soda that were stacked on the floor of defendant-appellant's supermarket. It appears that at the time of the accident, the supermarket's shelves, in accordance with usual practice, were being "packed out" with soda by an employee of either defendant-respondent bottling company or defendant soda distributor. The supermarket moved for summary judgment, contending that it did not create the alleged dangerous condition and that plaintiff's deposition testimony, to the effect that she walked to the soda aisle immediately after entering the store and did not see any soda on the floor before falling, shows that she cannot establish how long the soda had been on the floor before she fell. The motion court correctly held that such testimony does not establish, prima facie, the supermarket's lack of prior actual or constructive notice of the soda on the floor ( see Straus v. New Wah Fung Corp., 269 A.D.2d 140), or that it may not be held liable for an independent contractor's negligence on the basis of the supermarket's non-delegable duty to keep the public areas of its premises reasonably safe ( see Backiel v. Citibank, N.A., 299 A.D.2d 504, 507; Atkinson v. Golub Corp. Co., 278 A.D.2d 905, 906).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Toote v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2004
7 A.D.3d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Toote v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS TOOTE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Poidomani v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.

This is because Mannix, as the owner and operator of the supermarket, a place of public assembly, had a…

Daitch v. Naman

owner to take remedial action, a triable issue would remain as to whether the mold was a foreseeable…