From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toomey v. State

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 8, 2021
CV-19-00035-TUC-RM (LAB) (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)

Opinion

CV-19-00035-TUC-RM (LAB)

10-08-2021

Russell B Toomey, Plaintiff, v. State of Arizona, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Rosemary Marquez, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Stay Order (Doc. 242) and Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Court Order (Doc. 244). Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay Order (Doc. 243) and Defendants replied (Doc. 246). Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Court Order is not yet fully briefed.

Defendants' Motion to Stay Order (Doc. 242) seeks to stay the Court's September 21, 2021 Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and ordering Defendants to produce “all documents related to Defendants' decision-making regarding the exclusion of coverage for gender reassignment surgery as requested in Plaintiff's Requests for Production One, Three, and Nine, including legal advice that may have informed that decision-making” within fourteen days, or by October 5, 2021 (“the Order”) (Doc. 241). In their Motion to Stay, Defendants state that they intend to petition the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for a Writ of Mandamus regarding the Order, and the docket reflects that they have done so. (Doc. 245.)

“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). It is “beyond question that a district court has the power to grant a stay of its own order pending the determination of an appeal therefrom.” Nw. Nat. Ins. Co. v. Insco, Ltd., 866 F.Supp.2d 214, 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).

Having considered the circumstances present in this case, including Defendants' petition for Writ of Mandamus to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Order, the Court will temporarily stay the Order pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Stay Order and Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Court Order, in order to allow the Court to thoroughly consider the merits of those pending Motions.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court's September 21, 2021 Order (Doc. 241) is temporarily stayed pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Stay Order (Doc. 242) and Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Court Order (Doc. 244).


Summaries of

Toomey v. State

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 8, 2021
CV-19-00035-TUC-RM (LAB) (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Toomey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Russell B Toomey, Plaintiff, v. State of Arizona, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 8, 2021

Citations

CV-19-00035-TUC-RM (LAB) (D. Ariz. Oct. 8, 2021)