From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toombs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 3, 1992
605 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-479.

September 30, 1992. Rehearing Denied November 3, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, John Southwood, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Leroy Toombs has appealed an habitual offender sentence imposed after his conviction by jury of the sale of cocaine. The habitual offender statute requires that certain findings be made before the enhanced penalties afforded by that statute may be applied. § 775.084(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1989). See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1985); Knickerbocker v. State, 604 So.2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Rome v. State, 603 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Because the trial court herein failed to make the required findings, Toombs' sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toombs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 3, 1992
605 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Toombs v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEROY TOOMBS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 3, 1992

Citations

605 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

State v. Toombs

PER CURIAM. We review Toombs v. State, 605 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict of…

State ex rel. Tinsman v. Hott

The circuit court's pre-trial order did not permit the Tinsmans to introduce evidence that Mr. Graybill had…