From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toombs v. Fortson

U.S.
May 16, 1966
384 U.S. 210 (1966)

Summary

In Toombs v. Fortson, 384 U.S. 210, affirming 241 F. Supp. 65, we held that with certain exceptions, not here material, the Georgia Assembly could continue to function until May 1, 1968. Consequently the Georgia Assembly is not disqualified to elect a Governor as required by Article V of the State's Constitution. Neither is it disqualified by the fact that its Democratic members had obligated themselves to support the Democratic nominee in the general election on November 8, 1966. That election is over, and with it terminated any promises by the Democratic legislators to support the Democratic nominee.

Summary of this case from Fortson v. Morris

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

No. 1205.

Decided May 16, 1966.

241 F. Supp. 65, affirmed.

Francis Shackelford, Edward S. White, Emmet J. Bondurant II, Israel Katz and Hamilton Lokey for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and E. Freeman Leverett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Toombs v. Fortson

U.S.
May 16, 1966
384 U.S. 210 (1966)

In Toombs v. Fortson, 384 U.S. 210, affirming 241 F. Supp. 65, we held that with certain exceptions, not here material, the Georgia Assembly could continue to function until May 1, 1968. Consequently the Georgia Assembly is not disqualified to elect a Governor as required by Article V of the State's Constitution. Neither is it disqualified by the fact that its Democratic members had obligated themselves to support the Democratic nominee in the general election on November 8, 1966. That election is over, and with it terminated any promises by the Democratic legislators to support the Democratic nominee.

Summary of this case from Fortson v. Morris

In Toombs, the Court had affirmed without opinion the district court's holding that the then constituted apportionment of the Georgia State Assembly was unconstitutional.

Summary of this case from In re O. P. M. Leasing Services, Inc.
Case details for

Toombs v. Fortson

Case Details

Full title:TOOMBS ET AL. v . FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 16, 1966

Citations

384 U.S. 210 (1966)

Citing Cases

Fortson v. Morris

Pp. 233-234. (b) The Georgia Legislature is not disqualified for malapportionment to elect a Governor, since…

Toombs v. Fortson

This court must again consider the question of the apportionment of the General Assembly of Georgia. This…