From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tongren Acupuncturist, P.C. v. Mvaic

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Mar 6, 2012
950 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2010–2065 K C.

2012-03-6

TONGREN ACUPUNCTURIST, P.C. as Assignee of Carlos Davila, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.


Present: WESTON, J.P., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Lisa S. Ottley, J.), entered February 9, 2010, deemed from a judgment of the same court entered May 10, 2010 (see CPLR 5501[c] ). The judgment, entered pursuant to the February 9, 2010 order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $299.88.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, the order entered February 9, 2010 is vacated, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered February 9, 2010 which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment. A judgment was subsequently entered, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken ( seeCPLR 5501[c] ).

Since plaintiff and its assignor were aware of the identity of the owner of the vehicle in which the assignor had been a passenger at the time of the accident, plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against the vehicle's owner before seeking relief from MVAIC (Hauswirth v. American Home Assur. Co., 244 A.D.2d 528 [1997];Modern Art Med., P.C. v. MVAIC, 22 Misc.3d 126[A], 2008 N.Y. Slip Op 52586[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; Doctor Liliya Med., P.C. v. MVAIC, 21 Misc.3d 143[A], 2008 N.Y. Slip Op 52453[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; Dr. Abakin, D.C., P.C. v. MVAIC, 21 Misc.3d 134[A], 2008 N.Y. Slip Op 52186[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; Complete Med. Servs. of NY, P.C. v. MVAIC, 20 Misc.3d 137[A], 2008 N.Y. Slip Op 51541[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008] ). As plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies against the owner of the vehicle ( see e.g. Matter of Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. v. Barnes, 30 AD3d 523 [2006];Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v. Marciante, 8 AD3d 266 [2004] ), the judgment is reversed, the order entered February 9, 2010 is vacated, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is denied.


Summaries of

Tongren Acupuncturist, P.C. v. Mvaic

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Mar 6, 2012
950 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Tongren Acupuncturist, P.C. v. Mvaic

Case Details

Full title:TONGREN ACUPUNCTURIST, P.C. as Assignee of Carlos Davila, Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

950 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)