From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toney v. Hakala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Case No. 4:10-CV-2056-JAR (E.D. Mo. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10-CV-2056-JAR

06-25-2012

JAMES TONEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HAKALA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [ECF No. 142] wherein he states he served Defendants with a Request for Production of Documents on January 26, 2012. Defendants state Plaintiff never served them with Requests for Production of Documents (Response in Opposition, Doc. No. 140, ¶14). The Court is unable to determine whether a Request for Production of Documents was in fact served on Defendants.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff re-serve his Request for Production of Documents on Defendants by June 29, 2012.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents by July 20, 2012.

The parties may request additional time if necessary.

______________________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Toney v. Hakala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Case No. 4:10-CV-2056-JAR (E.D. Mo. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Toney v. Hakala

Case Details

Full title:JAMES TONEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HAKALA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

Case No. 4:10-CV-2056-JAR (E.D. Mo. Jun. 25, 2012)