From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 8, 2016
158 A.3d 64 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 170 WAL 2016

09-08-2016

Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM/UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?


Summaries of

Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Sep 8, 2016
158 A.3d 64 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER TONER, Petitioner v. THE TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 8, 2016

Citations

158 A.3d 64 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Trustgard Ins. Co. v. Campbell

Although the Parties do agree that the Sackett trilogy applies, a review of the cases following the Sackett…