From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1934
265 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1934)

Summary

declining to limit damages even though period of obligation was limited to one year

Summary of this case from LB 57th Street v. E.M. Blanchard, Inc.

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1934

Decided November 20, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

Stanley G. Falk and Rhoda V. Lewis for Stapell, Mumm Beals Corporation et al., appellants.

Wallace H. Miller for Frank Pandolfi, appellant.

O. Clyde Joslin for respondent.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ. Not sitting: LEHMAN, J.


Summaries of

Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1934
265 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1934)

declining to limit damages even though period of obligation was limited to one year

Summary of this case from LB 57th Street v. E.M. Blanchard, Inc.
Case details for

Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF TONAWANDA, Respondent, v. STAPELL, MUMM BEALS CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1934

Citations

265 N.Y. 630 (N.Y. 1934)
193 N.E. 419

Citing Cases

Yeshiva Univ. v. Fidelity

Reliance by the court below on this latter provision was error. As a rule, acceptance of performance under a…

Wholesale Serv. Sup. Corp. v. State of New York

(Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp., 147 Misc. 768, revd. on other grounds 240 App. Div. 472,…