Tompkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Full title: BURLEY D. TOMPKINS, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 28, 2015

2:12-CV-1481-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2015)

Opinion

BURLEY D. TOMPKINS, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. No. 2:12-CV-1481-CMK United States District Court, E.D. California. May 28, 2015

          ORDER

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff brings this civil action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. It has come to the court's attention that the July 3, 2014, scheduling order does not specify whether the parties shall file a joint pre-trial statement or separate pre-trial statements. Accordingly, the scheduling order is hereby amended to require separate pre-trial statements be filed pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 281.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.