From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tompkins v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 15, 1928
272 P. 490 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

No. A-6248.

Opinion Filed December 15, 1928.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal Where Appellant Shown Beyond Jurisdiction of Court. An appeal will not be considered by this court when the plaintiff in error is a fugitive from justice or is otherwise beyond the jurisdiction of the court and cannot be made to respond to any judgment or order which might be made in the case. When such state of facts is made to appear by proper motion and showing, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; Luther James, Judge.

Lillian Tompkins was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and she appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J.W. Simpson and E.I. Saddler, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., and Smith G. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county for manslaughter in the first degree, and was sentenced to serve a term of 60 years in the state penitentiary.

The appeal was lodged in this court May 22, 1926. Thereafter defendant gave an appeal bond, and was released from confinement. On March 12, 1928, the state filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, setting out that, since the appeal was lodged in this court, defendant has been convicted in the United States court for the Northern District of Oklahoma for a violation of the prohibition law, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the federal reformatory at Frankfort, Ky., and was committed to said prison at Frankfort, Ky., on March 5, 1928, and that defendant cannot be made to respond to any judgment or order which may be rendered in this case. Defendant and her bondsmen have filed a response to said motion admitting that defendant was convicted in the United States Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, as stated in the motion, and is now incarcerated and serving a sentence of two years in the reformatory at Frankfort, Ky., and pray that the court give them time to procure her return to the jurisdiction of this court. This response was filed March 16, 1928. Since then no further proceedings have been had so far as this court has been advised.

It is well settled by many decisions of this court that an appeal will not be considered, where the plaintiff in error is a fugitive or beyond the jurisdiction of the court, where he cannot be made to respond to any judgment or order which may be made in the case, and, upon proper motion and showing by the Attorney General, the appeal in such case will be dismissed. Morey v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 166, 117 P. 724; Belcher v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 50, 130 P. 515; Terrell v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 301, 217 P. 900.

It being conclusively shown and admitted that defendant is now outside the state of Oklahoma, and in the custody and under confinement in a United States prison, and that she cannot be made to respond to any judgment or order which might be made in this case, the appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.


Summaries of

Tompkins v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 15, 1928
272 P. 490 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Tompkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN TOMPKINS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 15, 1928

Citations

272 P. 490 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)
272 P. 490

Citing Cases

Price v. State

There have been many other cases where the defendant, subsequent to his conviction in the state court, has…