From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tompkins v. Mitchell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
449 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6856

10-05-2011

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendant at Mountain View Correctional Inst.; JOHN DOE BLACK, Mailroom Officer at Mountain View Correctional Inst.; PAUL TAYLOR, Assist. Superintendant of Programs at Mountain View Correctional Inst.; MIKE SLAGLE, at Lumberton Correctional Inst.; SHARON FRAZER, Program Supervisor at Lumberton Correctional Inst.; JOHN/JANE DOE, Supervisor, Mailroom at Mountain View Correctional Inst.; STEVE T. BAILEY, Director at Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cv-00186-RJC)

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his complaint and numerous post-judgment motions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Mitchell, No. 1:10-cv-00186-RJC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14 & Dec. 28, 2010 & June 22, 2011). We deny Tompkins' motion to compel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Tompkins v. Mitchell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
449 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Tompkins v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID MITCHELL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

449 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2011)