From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tompkins v. Herron

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 27, 2012
490 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-7210

11-27-2012

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOEL HERRON, Correctional Administrator; KRISTIE B. STANBACK, Assist. Superintendent; GERALDUNE O. LEWIS; JOHN DOE LOWERY, Sergant Over Mailroom; JOHN DOE INGRAM, Mailroom Staff; JANE DOE NORTON, Mailroom Staff; JANE DOE NORRIS, Mailroom Staff; ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prison; ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., Secretary of Correction; BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE, Governor's; JAMES C. FRYE, Program Manager; JOHN DOE COVINGTON, Unit Manager; JANE DOE ALFORD, Assistant Unit Manager; MARRIETTA BARR, Ex-Assistant Manager (Now Lieutenant); CHANDRA K. RANSOM, a/k/a Jane Doe, Ex-Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA) Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Herron, No 1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, & July 11, 2012). Tompkins' motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Tompkins v. Herron

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 27, 2012
490 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Tompkins v. Herron

Case Details

Full title:STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOEL HERRON, Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

490 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Taylor

"In such circumstances, the district court may consider a motion that would aid in an appeal by denying it or…

McNeill v. Poole

There is no evidence of a pattern or practice of mail interference. See Tompkins v. Herron, No. 1:10-CV-978,…