From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomlinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 14, 2004
876 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-1804.

July 14, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dale Ross, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-24478 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jeffery Tomlinson, timely appeals hos revocation of probation. We find Tomlinson's argument on the merits to be unpersuasive and decline to address it further. However, we acknowledge that the trial court's written order does not conform with its oral pronouncement. The trial court found Tomlinson guilty of violations 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16. Notwithstanding, the written order finds Tomlinson guilty of violations 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. "[W]here a written order and an oral pronouncement are in conflict, the oral pronouncement prevails." Lacey v. State, 831 So.2d 1267, 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The State does not contest which violations the trial court convicted Tomlinson on or that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement. Accordingly, we remand for clarification of the inconsistent written order.

REMANDED.

STONE, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tomlinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 14, 2004
876 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Tomlinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jeffery TOMLINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 14, 2004

Citations

876 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)