From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomlinson v. Detestatius

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1803
3 N.C. 284 (N.C. Super. 1803)

Opinion

(Spring Riding, 1803.)

If property of a deceased person be sold by order of court and by a public officer, as the sheriff, the executor may purchase it for less than its value, if he can; but if not sold by order of court and by the sheriff, the executor, if a purchaser, shall answer for the real value.

CASE upon promissory notes, and plene administravit was pleaded.


Upon evidence, it appeared the property was sold by order of court, by an auctioneer in the town of New Bern, and for less than its value, but not under any other circumstances of unfairness. It was purchased in by the widow, who was the executrix.


The law of England is as stated by plaintiff's counsel, that an executor or administrator cannot purchase but by paying the full value. The law, however, is different here; for here it is sold by order of court, and by a public officer, the sheriff, whose interest and duty it is to take care that it sells for its value. Therefore, she may purchase in such case for less than the real value, if she can; but if not sold by order of court, or not by the sheriff, the proper officer, she, the executrix, shall still answer for the real value.

NOTE. — See Boatwell v. Reynell, ante, 1, and the cases referred to in the note that case.


Summaries of

Tomlinson v. Detestatius

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1803
3 N.C. 284 (N.C. Super. 1803)
Case details for

Tomlinson v. Detestatius

Case Details

Full title:TOMLINSON'S EXECUTORS v. DETESTATIUS'S EXECUTORS

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1803

Citations

3 N.C. 284 (N.C. Super. 1803)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Woods

The limitation on the right of an executor to purchase at a sale of testator's land, is where the sale was…

Pearson v. Pearson

(3rd syllabus) Shute v. Austin, 120 N.C. 440. It will, as of course, be set aside at the instance of the…