From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomek v. Apple Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-02700-MCE-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-02700-MCE-DAD

01-06-2012

ALEX TOMEK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants.

ANTHONY A. FERRIGNO LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY A. FERRIGNO JACK T. HUMES LAW OFFICES OF JACK T. HUMES Attorneys for Plaintiff ALEX TOMEK PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH ALEXEI KLESTOFF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.


PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (BAR NO. 87607)

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (BAR NO. 175694)

ALEXEI KLESTOFF (BAR NO. 224016)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING ON

APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO

DISMISS


Date: January 26, 2012

Time: 2:00 pm

Ctrm: 7


Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Plaintiff Alex Tomek and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") hereby stipulate that the hearing on Apple's Motion to Dismiss presently scheduled for 2 p.m., January 26, 2012, shall be continued to 2 p.m., February 23, 2012 in order to accommodate the schedule of counsel and to allow both parties an equal amount of time to prepare their opposition and reply briefs.

Plaintiff and defendant further stipulate that plaintiff's brief in opposition to Apple's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served on January 26, 2012, and Apple's reply brief in support of the motion shall be filed and served on February 16, 2012.

ANTHONY A. FERRIGNO

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY A.

FERRIGNO

JACK T. HUMES

LAW OFFICES OF JACK T. HUMES

_________________________

JACK T. HUMES

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALEX TOMEK

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH

ALEXEI KLESTOFF

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

_________________________

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

ORDER

The hearing on Defendant Apple Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued until February 23, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiff's brief in opposition to Apple's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served on January 26, 2012, and Apple's reply brief in support of the motion shall be filed and served on February 16, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tomek v. Apple Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-02700-MCE-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Tomek v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEX TOMEK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-02700-MCE-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)