From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomassi v. Dominic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., WISNER, HURLBUTT AND KEHOE, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The conduct alleged is not sufficiently extreme or outrageous to support recovery on that theory ( see, Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34, 41; DeFilippo v. Xerox Corp., 223 A.D.2d 846, 847-848, lv dismissed 87 N.Y.2d 1056; Foley v. Mobil Chem. Co., 214 A.D.2d 1003, 1005).


Summaries of

Tomassi v. Dominic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Tomassi v. Dominic

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH E. TOMASSI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL DOMINIC AND THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Morse v. Wyoming County Community Hosp

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning either the falsity of the Hospital's reason for…