From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomasini v. Huggard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
2:18-cv-3020 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-3020 MCE CKD P

07-22-2021

PAUL C. TOMASINI, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA DUNCAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 8, 2021, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed June 29, 2021, denying plaintiff's motion for a stay, denying plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply, striking the sur-reply filed by plaintiff on June 23, 2021, and denying plaintiff's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tomasini v. Huggard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
2:18-cv-3020 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Tomasini v. Huggard

Case Details

Full title:PAUL C. TOMASINI, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA DUNCAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-3020 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)