From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tolliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 12, 2009
10 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 5D08-137, 5D08-187.

June 12, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jay P. Cohen, Judge.

Adam H. Sudbury, of Dorough, Calzada, Soto Sudbury LLP, Orlando, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


In this consolidated appeal, Kelvin Tolliver and Diamond Williams (defendants) appeal their judgments and sentences which were entered by the trial court after a jury found the men guilty of committing the crime of armed robbery. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

We write to address concerns arising from statements made by counsel during oral argument indicating that an affirmance by this court in this matter might be used to later argue that the defendants are not entitled to pursue post-conviction relief for alleged ineffective assistance of counsel claims due to the fact that such claims were raised in this direct appeal. Such is not the case. Although the defendants raised claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in this direct appeal, the record evidence is insufficient to allow us to rule on said claims. However, the defendants are not precluded by this opinion from raising their claims through a properly filed post-conviction motion because such claims are ordinarily raised in a motion for post-conviction relief and it is the rare case where such a claim can be disposed of on direct appeal. See Smith v. State, 998 So.2d 516 (Fla. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, J. and THOMPSON, JR., E., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Tolliver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 12, 2009
10 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Tolliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kelvin TOLLIVER, et al., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 12, 2009

Citations

10 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Vanauken v. State

Finally, the trial court concluded that claim five should have been raised on direct appeal. Again, we…