From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tolliver v. Horel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
298 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-15022.

Submitted October 31, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 4, 2008.

Darryl L. Tolliver, Folsom, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-05967-VRW.

Before: HAWKINS, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On September 11, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why

the district court's judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order of Dismissal dated December 5, 2007.

A review of the record and appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Tolliver v. Horel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
298 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Tolliver v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:Darryl L. TOLLIVER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert A. HOREL, Warden; et…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 2008

Citations

298 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2008)