Toll v. Reeber

1 Citing case

  1. S.S. White Techs. v. Mahe Med. U.S.

    8:22-cv-2955-VMC-TGW (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2024)

    “In intentional tort cases, there are two tests to determine whether purposeful availment has occurred: the effects test articulated in Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 [] (1984), and the traditional minimum contacts test for purposeful availment.” Toll v. North, 644 F.Supp.3d 1050, 1054 (S.D. Fla. 2022) (citing Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A., 736 F.3d at 1356). Shukla Medical has failed to establish this Court's jurisdiction over Mahe Medical under either of these tests.