From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toliver v. Soles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-02612-MMD-DJA (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-02612-MMD-DJA

03-27-2020

GEORGE A. TOLIVER, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICER J. SOLES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff George A. Toliver brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("Recommendation") of United States Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ECF No. 41.) Judge Albregts recommends that the Court dismiss Defendant John D. Mehalko, Jr. pursuant to the Court's notice of intent to dismiss (ECF No. 31). (ECF NO. 41 at 2). Plaintiff had until March 25, 2020, to file an objection. (See id.) To date, no objection to the recommendation has been filed. For this reason, and as explained below, the Court adopts the Recommendation.

This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) ("De novo review of the magistrate judges' findings and recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the findings and recommendations.") (emphasis in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (1983) (providing that the Court "need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation").

Nevertheless, the Court conducts de novo review to determine whether to accept the Recommendation. The Court issued a notice of intent to dismiss Mehalko pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) unless proof of service was filed by January 4, 2020. (ECF No. 31.) Judge Albregts notes that Plaintiff did not file such proof of service by January 4, 2020. (ECF No. 41 at 1.) Therefore, Judge Albregts recommends that the Court dismiss Mehalko from this case. (Id.) Upon reviewing the Recommendation and underlying filings, this Court finds good cause to adopt Judge Albregts' Recommendation.

It is therefore ordered that Judge Albregts' Recommendation (ECF No. 41) is adopted in its entirety.

It is further ordered that Defendant John D. Mehalko, Jr. is dismissed from this action.

DATED THIS 27th day of March 2020.

/s/_________

MIRANDA M. DU

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Toliver v. Soles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 2:17-cv-02612-MMD-DJA (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Toliver v. Soles

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. TOLIVER, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICER J…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-02612-MMD-DJA (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2020)