From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toliver v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-20

In the Matter of Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

Michael Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.



Michael Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.
Before: ROSE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR., STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner returned to his cell block in his wheelchair, but was ordered to put the wheelchair in the storage room and use his walker to return to his cell. Petitioner refused and maintained that he had medical authorization to use the wheelchair at all times. After correction officials confirmed that petitioner had medical authorization to use the wheelchair only for long distances, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order, making a false statement and violating facility movement regulations. Petitioner pleaded guilty with an explanation to the charge of refusing a direct order and, following a tier II disciplinary hearing, he was found not guilty of the remaining two charges. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Inasmuch as petitioner pleaded guilty with explanation to refusing a direct order, he is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Ayrhart v. Fischer, 94 A.D.3d 1310, 1311, 942 N.Y.S.2d 385 [2012];Matter of McMoore v. Bezio, 67 A.D.3d 1218, 888 N.Y.S.2d 678 [2009] ). Therefore, the determination must be confirmed.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Toliver v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Toliver v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
98 A.D.3d 1170
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6232

Citing Cases

Perea v. Fischer

CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm. Initially, that part of the determination finding petitioner…

Flemming v. Rock

Respondent affirmed the determination on administrative appeal and petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR…