However, another of our sister courts has reasoned that "appellant's attorney may have declined to object to the reading of the enhancement paragraphs in an attempt to avoid calling further attention to appellant's prior convictions," and trial counsel's performance was therefore not per se deficient. Hardin, 951 S.W.2d at 212; see also Toledo v. State, No. 13-17-00699-CR, 2019 WL 3819870, at *4 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi-Edinburg Aug. 15, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)