From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toledo-Flores v. U.S.

U.S.
Apr 3, 2006
547 U.S. 1054 (2006)

Summary

In Toledo-Flores, the defendant-appellant objected to the sentencing court's determination that his state simple possession offense, a felony under Texas law and a misdemeanor under federal law constitutes an "aggravated felony" for sentence enhancement purposes.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Figueroa-Ocampo

Opinion

No. 05-7664.

April 3, 2006.


C.A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner in No. 05-7664 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Reported below: No. 05-547, 417 F. 3d 934; No. 05-7664,149 Fed. Appx. 241.


Summaries of

Toledo-Flores v. U.S.

U.S.
Apr 3, 2006
547 U.S. 1054 (2006)

In Toledo-Flores, the defendant-appellant objected to the sentencing court's determination that his state simple possession offense, a felony under Texas law and a misdemeanor under federal law constitutes an "aggravated felony" for sentence enhancement purposes.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Figueroa-Ocampo
Case details for

Toledo-Flores v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:TOLEDO-FLORES v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 3, 2006

Citations

547 U.S. 1054 (2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Figueroa-Ocampo

Figueroa-Ocampo reasoned that the definition of the term "aggravated felony" for immigration purposes applies…

Long v. Department of Homeland Security

Shortly thereafter, on April 3, 2006, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Lopez v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 934…