From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toledano v. Horowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-00314

Submitted November 27, 2001.

December 17, 2001.

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated December 21, 2000, which denied her motion to vacate the dismissal of the action upon her default in appearing at a hearing to determine whether the defendants were served with process.

Avi J. Kasten, Oceanside, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, THOMAS A. ADAMS, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The denial of the plaintiff's motion to vacate her default was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Alliance Prop. Mgt. Dev. v. Andrews Ave. Equities, 70 N.Y.2d 831; Seven Acre Wood St. Assocs. v. Wood, A.D.2d [2d Dept., Aug. 20, 2001]).

FRIEDMANN, J.P., SMITH, ADAMS and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toledano v. Horowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Toledano v. Horowitz

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE TOLEDANO, appellant, v. HAROLD A. HOROWITZ, et al., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 900