Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-77-MHT [WO].
March 7, 2008
ORDER
The magistrate judge filed a recommendation (Doc. #4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the recommendation and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
(1) The recommendation (Doc. #4) of the magistrate judge is adopted.
(2) This case is dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
(3) Costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.