From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd v. Lamarque

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Feb 15, 2008
No. C 03-3995 SBA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 03-3995 SBA.

February 15, 2008


ORDER [Docket No. 339]


Before the Court is Michael A. Todd's Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time on Plaintiff Michael A. Todd's Motion for Imposition of Sanctions [Docket No. 339] (the "Ex Parte Motion"), which requests the Court shorten the time to consider his Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Imposition of Sanctions [Docket No. 343] (the "Motion"). The Motion requests the Court to advise the jury that non-party, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, violated discovery orders issued by Magistrate Judge Zimmerman. The Court DENIES the Ex Parte Motion. If Todd desires the Court to give further consideration to this request, he should notice the Motion for a hearing, in accordance with the Court's Standing Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Todd v. Lamarque

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Feb 15, 2008
No. C 03-3995 SBA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Todd v. Lamarque

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. TODD, Plaintiff, v. A. LAMARQUE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Feb 15, 2008

Citations

No. C 03-3995 SBA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)