From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd Shipyards Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 22, 1986
791 F.2d 164 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

Opinion

Appeal No. 86-692.

May 22, 1986.

Michol O'Connor, Haight, Gardner, Poor and Havens, Houston, Tex., argued, for appellant. With him on brief, were James J. Sentner, Jr. and Gary L. Blum.

Florence M. Peterson, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued, for appellee. With him on brief, were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge Intern. Trade Field Office.

Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade; Restani, Judge.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and NIES and ARCHER, Circuit Judges.


Todd Shipyards Corporation appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, which granted the United States' motion for summary judgment in 624 F. Supp. 1553. We affirm.

OPINION

We have carefully considered each of Todd's arguments; however, it has failed to establish any error in the court's holding that the United States Customs Service correctly classified Todd's "Big T" as a "floating dock" under item 696.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm on the basis of Judge Restani's opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Todd Shipyards Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 22, 1986
791 F.2d 164 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Todd Shipyards Corporation v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 22, 1986

Citations

791 F.2d 164 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. U.S.

The meaning of a term for tariff purposes is not controlled by a definition provided by statutes,…