Tocco v. Tocco

Full title: SAM TOCCO, Plaintiff, v. SAM ANTHONY TOCCO, AND KNOLLWOOD MEMORIAL PARK…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 6, 2005

Civil Action No. 05-CV-70013-DT (E.D. Mich. Oct. 6, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-CV-70013-DT.

October 6, 2005

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

MONA MAJZOUB, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint which has been referred to the undersigned for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On October 6, 2005, the parties appeared before the Court to argue the matter. For the reasons enunciated in Court, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS ZADA'S (DOCKET # 72) AND GONWAY'S (DOCKET # 75) MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants Zada's and Gonway's Motions for Protective Order which have been referred to the undersigned for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On October 6, 2005, the parties appeared before the Court to argue the matter. For the reasons enunciated in Court, both Defendants Zada's and Gonway's Motions for Protective Order are GRANTED. The entry of these Protective Orders precludes the depositions of either Defendant Zada or Gonway until after these Defendants have filed a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).