Opinion
No. 59156.
09-15-2011
Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Holley & Thompson/Las Vegas Martin & Allison, Ltd.
Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Holley & Thompson/Las Vegas
Martin & Allison, Ltd.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a district court order granting a motion in limine. Specifically, by the terms of this order, petitioner is precluded from arguing at the upcoming trial that it is not liable for any damages for breaching a lease because, it alleges, it is merely the property manager, not the landlord. Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. NRS 34.160 ; NRS 34.320 ; Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991) ; see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Petitioner remains free to raise these issues on appeal from any final judgment. Accordingly, we
We deny petitioner's emergency stay request as moot in light of this order.
--------