Opinion
21-1191
09-20-2022
MUZEM ACHA TITUS, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
ON BRIEF: Danielle L.C. Beach, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Shelley Goad, Assistant Director, Kristin Moresi, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: August 29, 2022
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
ON BRIEF: Danielle L.C. Beach, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Shelley Goad, Assistant Director, Kristin Moresi, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Muzem Acha Titus, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Titus (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED