From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Titus v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
6:08-CV-0227 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

6:08-CV-0227 (LEK/VEB).

July 6, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on June 14, 2010, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 24).

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Titus v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
6:08-CV-0227 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Titus v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TANYA TITUS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

6:08-CV-0227 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)