From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Hawthorne Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2016
Case No. CV 16-05924 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-05924 JLS (RAO)

12-22-2016

TITO ACE THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. HAWTHORNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the other records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

In his objections, Plaintiff argues that he should be allowed to amend his complaint because he has discovered additional facts to support his case. (Dkt. No. 26.) Plaintiff's arguments refer to the same events alleged in his First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff again states that those events took place in 2005 and 2009. (See id. at 2.) Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to suggest that he could amend his claims such that they are not barred by the statute of limitations, and for the reasons stated in the Report, dismissal with prejudice is appropriate.

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: 12/22/16

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Hawthorne Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2016
Case No. CV 16-05924 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Thomas v. Hawthorne Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:TITO ACE THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. HAWTHORNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 16-05924 JLS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)