From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tisdale v. Weavil

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 13, 2024
1:24CV166 (M.D.N.C. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

1:24CV166

05-13-2024

IVORY JOE TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. T.A. WEAVIL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge

On April 29, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 6.)

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous and failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, as well as for seeking monetary relief against defendants who are immune from such relief.


Summaries of

Tisdale v. Weavil

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 13, 2024
1:24CV166 (M.D.N.C. May. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Tisdale v. Weavil

Case Details

Full title:IVORY JOE TISDALE, Plaintiff, v. T.A. WEAVIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: May 13, 2024

Citations

1:24CV166 (M.D.N.C. May. 13, 2024)